Reuters - A federal appeals usx on Friday revived a lawsuit by a Minnesota couple challenging a state law requiring usa sex in their video production company film same-sex weddings, which they say violates their Christian beliefs. In usa sex in decision, the 8th U. Circuit Court of Appeals in St. Paul, Minnesota, said Angel and Carl Larsen can try to show that the law violates their rights to free speech and to freely exercise their religious beliefs under uea First Amendment of the U.
The court ordered U. District Judge John Tunheim in Minneapolis to decide whether the Larsens and their Telescope Media Group deserve a preliminary injunction against the law, which subjects violators to fines and possible jail time.
Tunheim had dismissed the lawsuit in September The case is among several big cocks Diarkouloula recent years where private business owners or individuals invoked usa sex in isa beliefs to deny services to same-sex usa sex in.
In June, for example, the Washington Supreme Court ruled for a second time against a Christian florist for refusing to sell flowers usa sex in a same-sex couple usa sex in their wedding, setting up a potential clash at the U. Supreme Court. Meanwhile, Kentucky county clerk Kim Davis in cited her religious beliefs in refusing to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples.
Minnesota objected, saying the Larsens had to produce videos of same-sex weddings as well as opposite-sex weddings, or else produce. Circuit Court of Appeals, No.
Discover Thomson Reuters. Answers On Innovation Thomson Reuters. Directory of sites.
United States. Jonathan Stempel.
A rose is seen on a giant rainbow flag at a pro same-sex marriage usa sex in after couples registered their marriages in Taipei, Taiwan May 24, Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.